Friday, May 4, 2012
What about my novel?
I am still working on my novel, but badly. When I do write, the quality is still the same as before, but there's something different... It took a while for me to put my finger on, and I think it has something to do with the intensity of the imaginary world that surrounds you when you are writing a novel. I have created so many imaginary places, all that have sounds and smells, weather, atmosphere, and a feeling underfoot. My characters are as if they were real people, with annoying habits, endearing qualities and flaws, with brows that wrinkle a certain way during specific emotions, with a particular gait, and with history. I have the story, both the grand tale and the perhaps-waiting-to-be-edited-out smaller scenes, floating about inside my brain, waiting to be caught and pinned onto paper. But mostly, it is a feeling. This novel has a feeling to me, and it is a feeling that I am totally encompassed by.
Or should I say 'was'. I still have reasonable chunks of time where this is the case, but having a baby (I'm assuming particularly your first baby, and perhaps also doing this as a reasonably new expat) is a pretty all-encompassing thing. It seems that the bubbles of my internal worlds have collided. The image of rain pouring through the veins of a cobbled street has to share space with the cloth-versus-disposable debate, with the hunt for baby singlets (which, incidentally, I had to buy from Bonds in Australia, as my hunts here were fruitless!), the worry about whether that little tumble down the stairs caused real damage, the research into prams and baby-carriers and car-seats and boobies and ways to prevent premature birth and ways to kick-start labour... Add to that the list of health complications that make it all the more difficult for me to get to my writing places, and I'm starting to see the problem.
Of course I realise this isn't going to stop. It's not like this little bean will pop out of me (superman style, says the hubby) and then suddenly I can regain the imaginary world of my novel. I'm not deluded. I had thought that having a definite 'due date' was like giving myself a deadline that I had to work hard towards, but I soon found that I needed to manage my stress better, and what with the doctors consistently telling me to relax, I eased up on myself a bit.
So yes, I am still writing, and still writing what I consider half-decent words. I figure, though, that this is a balancing act I'll have to keep for the next twenty (or thirty!) years now!
Friday, March 30, 2012
Learning to be hypnotised
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Rambles of a Beanie Nature
Monday, March 19, 2012
I'm so postmodern
Eugenides: I've blended postmodern and traditional I think. My narrator in Middlesex is not entirely reliable; he's inventing the past as much as he is telling it. "You can't really know much about what you really know" is the bottom line, which is an old postmodern strategy. There's a lot of self conscious narration in the book, which is an issue in a lot of postmodern literature as well. Along with that, there are very old-fashioned narrative techniques in it, of telling about wars and the burning of Smyrna. But postmodernism is always recuperating old styles of narration. The one thing that I definitely believe is that strict postmodernists don't all believe that I believe in this power of story-telling. I think that people are still interested in this old-fashioned goals or traits of novels. Something that seizes you, that grabs your attention and gives you a ride through a book. So, I don't want to constantly frustrate the reader by taking him down on dead ends, at the dead end of literature or something -- that doesn't interest me. I want, in a way, a Classical shape to my books and a pleasing and elegant form to them, which is old-fashioned. But within that, I still have a lot of postmodern play without the continuing sense of relativism that… I got so tired of.